Friday, November 11, 2005

The Republicrats and Demoblicans

Radio talk show host Michael Savage refers to the Democrats as the “Demoncats”. That’s pretty close and I love the way he can come up with alternate names for people, such as “Upchuck Schumer” for Senator Chuck Schumer of New York. (For more alternate names on what people and things should be called, see my blogpage at Marcus E. Harvey Online.) However, I think “Devilcrats” has a better ring to it.

When the ’Publicans, however, act like the Devilcrats, it makes me think we ought to call them the “Republicrats.”

My dream would be to see the destruction of the Devilcratic Party. No, I’m not a one-party absolutist type who wants no dissent or democratic debate. However, I would rather see our two-party choices be between Republicans and conservatives. Between conservative-lite and real-conservativism. Heck, even between Republicans and Libertarians.

The imploding Democratic Party should simply join the Libertarian Party. The Devilcrats currently claim to be the party of fiscal responsibility, worried about deficits and spending, that is, until they ever got back into power. Howard Dean even tries to sound conservative by talking about smaller government and privacy from the government. That almost sounds Libertarian. If the Democrats would truly become the party of smaller government, I could almost become a Democrat. The Libertarians also favor the legalization of marijuana and prostitution. The Libertarians are against the Iraq War. I don’t see why these policies are a problem for the Devilcrats. If the Devilcrats could give up their big-government program solutions, perhaps they could join with the Libertarians.

But what Devilcrat would ever want to abolish the IRS as the Libertarians do?

Right now, however, we have Republicans who are gutless-wonders, killing every conservative idea to come through Congress, out of some fear of the liberal media or the Devilcrats or something. (Witness the recent dropping of ANWR drilling and now dropping the vote on spending cuts.) For this cause, we really have two very similar political parties in the country, leaving us with little difference in our political choices: the Republicrats and the Demoblicans.

That’s why I call for a new two-party structure between Republicans and conservatives (or even Libertarians). We need real choice rather than our current options of Democrats and Democrats-lite (i.e. Republicans).

Disaffected Democrats, join the Libertarian Party.


Tuesday, November 08, 2005

eu·phe·mism (yf-mzm)
n. The act or an example of substituting a mild, indirect, or vague term for one considered harsh, blunt, or offensive.
One of the Devilcrats' most effective and insidious political tactics has been the use of euphemisms to disguise the true evils that they advocate. What makes this evil? Isaiah 5:20 says
"Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter."
Let's consider a brief lexicon of Devilcratic euphemisms:
  • Abortion = "pro-choice"
  • Condoning evil = "tolerance"
  • Euthanasia = "death with dignity"
  • Sin = "alternative lifestyle"
  • Standing up for truth = "hate speech"
In seeking to control the language or terminology that we use, the Devilcrats control the debate and agenda to some extent. Through their willing accomplices in the media:
  • Illegal aliens have become "undocumented workers"
  • The Constitutional option of ending judicial filibusters becomes the "nuclear option"
  • Terrorists become "insurgents"
  • Conservatives become "right-wing extremists"
  • Bible-believing Christians become "fundamentalists"
  • and Democrats become "mainstream"
Republicans and Independants often find themselves using these terms created by the Devilcrats and the media which skew the debate from the outset by investing an innocous meaning into the words. We need to be careful and aware of the terms that we use, lest we fall into the snare and the condemnation of the Devilcrats.


Call in to national and local talkshows like The Rush Limbaugh Show or The Laura Ingraham Show or The Hugh Hewitt Show (three of my favorites), and use the terms "Devilcrats" or "Devilcratic" non-chalantly, without making your use of those terms the point of your call (though the observant host may not let you get away with it unnoticed).


Monday, November 07, 2005

Call 'em the "Devilcrats"

The purpose of this blog is to encourage the subtle use of the word "Devilcrats" when referring to the Democrats and to highlight the ways in which they live up to this name. If you say "Devilcrats" or "Devilcratic" quickly and naturally enough, it sounds just about like "Democrats" and "Democratic". This will subliminally demonize the Democrats in the minds of people all over the United States. In any war, one side demonizes the other. For example, in World War II, the Germans were called the "Huns" or the "Krauts" and the Japanese the "gooks". While some might think it wrong to demonize one's enemies, the Devilcrats have demonized themselves.

Right now America is a great cultural civil war which will determine whether we go the way of godliness, or the way of Satan, a.k.a. the Devil. The Devilcrats seem to be on the wrong side of nearly every issue socially and politically. The Devilcrats favor a number of "biblically incorrect" policies:
  • Abortion
  • Euthanasia
  • Homosexual marriage
In the coming posts, I plan to continue to show using current events how the Democrats would be more accurately called the "Devilcrats". The purpose of this blog is to expose the hypocrisy of the Devilcrats, in keeping with the words of the Bible:
"Have nothing to do with the fruitless deeds of darkness, but rather expose them."
(Ephesians 5:11 )
I hope you enjoy.

Marcus E. Harvey